This is the second time in a very short time I’ve gotten spam with the subject “coffee.” Is nothing sacred anymore? Well, to the spammers no, but shouldn’t there be some sort of built-in thingamabob in the mail protocols that make sure this deson’t happen? Because if a subjet is “coffee” then I want it to be about coffee damnit. Coffee is sacred.

Comments

1. Is nothing sacred anymore, you ask after the events of Article 36? I think the answer is rather obbious, really.
   — Boo    (@ 12. May 2004, 19:44)
2. Obvious, gorram! Much good that preview button did.
   — Boo    (@ 12. May 2004, 19:45)
3. Boo: now smack me up and call me Billy Bob Elevator Junkie, but I don’t think one should use Article 36 as a standard. The world would be much more boring then, as no one would ever be shocked or surprised. Having said that, coffee is always considered sacred no matter what. Even in a post-Article 36 world.
   — Nicklas    (@ 12. May 2004, 22:26)
4. What about dark chocolate? I think chocolate is more sacred that coffee. Maybe that’s because I haven’t learnt to drink coffee yet.
   — darnia    (@ 13. May 2004, 00:45)
5. While dark chocolate is good and all that, it’s not as holy as a good pint of pitch black coffee. For instance, it’s very rare that you get weird ideas after a bit too much chocolate. This doesn’t mean that spammers can use it a a subject though—that would be almost just as wrong.
   — Nicklas    (@ 13. May 2004, 14:31)
6. There’s no such thing as “a bit too much chocolate”.
   — darnia    (@ 13. May 2004, 20:38)
7. darnia: And that is why it’s rare that you get weird ideas after, and that is why coffee is way better. Not the only reason but a good start. Coffee Power!!
   — Boo    (@ 13. May 2004, 20:43)
8. Darnia: Oh yes, there’s certainly is a such thing! Chocolate bad, BAD.
   — Tommy    (@ 14. May 2004, 19:40)

Home / Archive | About | Gallery | RSS / Atom
For email, use your imagination at carbonatedink.com